Difference between revisions of "Talk:Trident Cyber9320"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's interesting that the page states that this card is supported by the "trident" driver in Xorg, while the [http://ftp.x.org/pub/X11R6.9.0/doc/html/trident.4.html documentation] makes no mention of it. In any case, the best I've managed to eek out of this driver on my 9320-equipped 760EL is a 1-bit display, followed by an interesting corruption of the VRAM, resulting in only the letters J, K, L, M, N, O, Z, and punctiuation remaining in the console. | It's interesting that the page states that this card is supported by the "trident" driver in Xorg, while the [http://ftp.x.org/pub/X11R6.9.0/doc/html/trident.4.html documentation] makes no mention of it. In any case, the best I've managed to eek out of this driver on my 9320-equipped 760EL is a 1-bit display, followed by an interesting corruption of the VRAM, resulting in only the letters J, K, L, M, N, O, Z, and punctiuation remaining in the console. | ||
+ | |||
+ | If no one challenges my thoughts on this idea and I don't manage to get it running within the next week, I will change the page to reflect that it is indeed [i]not[/i] supported. |
Revision as of 07:37, 6 March 2006
It's interesting that the page states that this card is supported by the "trident" driver in Xorg, while the documentation makes no mention of it. In any case, the best I've managed to eek out of this driver on my 9320-equipped 760EL is a 1-bit display, followed by an interesting corruption of the VRAM, resulting in only the letters J, K, L, M, N, O, Z, and punctiuation remaining in the console.
If no one challenges my thoughts on this idea and I don't manage to get it running within the next week, I will change the page to reflect that it is indeed [i]not[/i] supported.