Difference between revisions of "Talk:Modem Devices"
(About the MDC-2 link) |
(→About the MDC-2 link) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--[[User:Hmh|hmh]] 2006-02-23 01:51 UTC | --[[User:Hmh|hmh]] 2006-02-23 01:51 UTC | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please look carefully at the page, the MDC-2 was '''already''' listed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Tonko|Tonko]] 02:30, 24 February 2006 (CET) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Doh, indeed it was. But why is it under Agere? The MDC-2 page makes no mention of Agere, only of Conexant and Smartlink, and the drivers (which do work) are from Conexant, which is confusing at best. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Hmh|hmh]] 2006-02-24 17:09 UTC | ||
Latest revision as of 18:28, 24 February 2006
Which Models have supported modems? Which are not supported? A list would be useful. --84.184.183.252 20:17, 27 Mar 2005 (CEST)
About the MDC-2 link
Well, since my change was reverted, I better propose this for discursion instead of acting on it:
I oppose the removal on the grounds that there is a IBM Integrated 56K Modem (MDC-2) page, and that the Modem Devices page acts like an index for all the modem pages, so it makes sense to have that page listed.
Also, the IBM Integrated 56K Modem (MDC-2) page seems to be better (content-wise) than ThinkPad 56K Modem (MDC-1.5) anyway, so if a page is to be removed, the MDC-1.5 should be the one IMHO.
--hmh 2006-02-23 01:51 UTC
Please look carefully at the page, the MDC-2 was already listed.
--Tonko 02:30, 24 February 2006 (CET)
Doh, indeed it was. But why is it under Agere? The MDC-2 page makes no mention of Agere, only of Conexant and Smartlink, and the drivers (which do work) are from Conexant, which is confusing at best.
--hmh 2006-02-24 17:09 UTC
