Difference between revisions of "Talk:Active Protection System"
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
It does not read the actual sensors which gets done by a seperate device driver (shockprf.sys) | It does not read the actual sensors which gets done by a seperate device driver (shockprf.sys) | ||
− | + | == IBM not interested == | |
I have contacted IBM several times on the providing of specs for the APS. They are simply not interested. And yes, everybody within IBM may at any time experiment with Linux. But no, since there is no commercial interest for a Linux-port of this APS-feature, they are not doing it. | I have contacted IBM several times on the providing of specs for the APS. They are simply not interested. And yes, everybody within IBM may at any time experiment with Linux. But no, since there is no commercial interest for a Linux-port of this APS-feature, they are not doing it. | ||
Gijs :-( | Gijs :-( | ||
+ | |||
+ | == discussion on the kernel mailing list == | ||
+ | |||
+ | There has been some ongoing discussions about HDAPS on the linux kernel mailinglist: [http://groups.google.at/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/a8a47148efa90f49/cdfab5aa2155a8af?q=IBM+HDAPS+Someone+interested%3F+(Accelerometer)] | ||
+ | |||
+ | maybe something comes out of this,<br/> | ||
+ | tamer. |
Revision as of 14:13, 2 July 2005
Hi, is it worth to contact ibm in some sort of conserted effort to get this going?
Just found this thread, http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0412.1/index.html#0544.
Of particular interest is some code that got posted there. --Danguy 05:28, 28 Apr 2005 (CEST)
useless code
This (C#) code is useless.
It does not read the actual sensors which gets done by a seperate device driver (shockprf.sys)
IBM not interested
I have contacted IBM several times on the providing of specs for the APS. They are simply not interested. And yes, everybody within IBM may at any time experiment with Linux. But no, since there is no commercial interest for a Linux-port of this APS-feature, they are not doing it.
Gijs :-(
discussion on the kernel mailing list
There has been some ongoing discussions about HDAPS on the linux kernel mailinglist: [1]
maybe something comes out of this,
tamer.