Difference between revisions of "Talk:Active Protection System"
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
maybe something comes out of this,<br/> | maybe something comes out of this,<br/> | ||
tamer. | tamer. | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Today I recorded data from a ride home. The result is at http://thebe.orbit.homelinux.net/~alphaone/data.ps | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tools used to create it are in /util in my svn rep. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Daniel Willmann|Daniel Willmann]] 18:41, 5 Jul 2005 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 08:26, 19 July 2005
Hi, is it worth to contact ibm in some sort of conserted effort to get this going?
Just found this thread, http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0412.1/index.html#0544.
Of particular interest is some code that got posted there. --Danguy 05:28, 28 Apr 2005 (CEST)
useless code
This (C#) code is useless.
It does not read the actual sensors which gets done by a seperate device driver (shockprf.sys)
IBM not interested
I have contacted IBM several times on the providing of specs for the APS. They are simply not interested. And yes, everybody within IBM may at any time experiment with Linux. But no, since there is no commercial interest for a Linux-port of this APS-feature, they are not doing it.
Gijs :-(
discussion on the kernel mailing list
There has been some ongoing discussions about HDAPS on the linux kernel mailinglist: [1]
maybe something comes out of this,
tamer.
Today I recorded data from a ride home. The result is at http://thebe.orbit.homelinux.net/~alphaone/data.ps
Tools used to create it are in /util in my svn rep.
--Daniel Willmann 18:41, 5 Jul 2005 (CEST)
