Difference between revisions of "User talk:Pebolle"

From ThinkWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(HPAFS: some reservations)
m (forgot sig)
Line 29: Line 29:
  
 
By the way, would hpafs really qualify as a "driver"? I'd say it's more a "tool" or a "utility".
 
By the way, would hpafs really qualify as a "driver"? I'd say it's more a "tool" or a "utility".
 +
 +
[[User:Pebolle|Paul Bolle]] 14:45, 3 March 2006 (CET)

Revision as of 14:45, 3 March 2006

Removing the discussion on the PreDesktop Area Talk page is fine. ;-) I added some of the information from the IBM link discussion into the article, though, since i think it sheds more light into the difference between PSAs and RPs.

Wyrfel 12:39, 5 Nov 2005 (CET)


Nice to hear. Edits are fine with me (until I change my mind and invoke the power to reedit that a Wiki gives its users ...)

Paul Bolle 22:40, 5 Nov 2005 (CET)


Hei, just wanted to tell you that i appreciate what you did to the PreDesktop Area pages (reorg). Wyrfel 03:18, 21 January 2006 (CET)


Nice to hear. Thanks.

Paul Bolle 00:35, 24 January 2006 (CET)


Just saw your edit in Talk:Predesktop Area. ;-) If you have such a long result output, just surround it by >pre></pre> tags. Especially on talk pages it doesn't matter that much.

I believe that when ThinkWiki uses MediaWiki 1.6, i can modify the templates to make things (like multiline) more simple.

Wyrfel 22:30, 24 January 2006 (CET)


HPAFS

Hei, you might wanna create a separate "hpafs" page for your driver and categorize it as a driver page.

Wyrfel 01:41, 3 March 2006 (CET)

Well I said "alpha quality" (or something similar). Maybe that's even too optimistic: proof of concept might be better. I know the mantra is "release early, release often" but this might be too early ...

By the way, would hpafs really qualify as a "driver"? I'd say it's more a "tool" or a "utility".

Paul Bolle 14:45, 3 March 2006 (CET)