Difference between revisions of "Talk:3Dfps"

From ThinkWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
I [[User:Nomeata|Nomeata]] suggest
+
''(for discussoin of formatting, see history -- [[User:Nomeata|Nomeata]])''
  
*Thinkpad Model (i.e. Thinkpad T40)
+
Shoudn't the kernel be after the driver, since I'd rather compare different kernels and same driver than different driver and same kernel? --[[User:Nomeata|Nomeata]] 13:25, 29 Sep 2004 (CEST)
**test application (i.e. glxgears / 3Dmark2000 / ... )
 
***Driver (i.e. fglrx / xfree / xorg / ibm / dna / omega / ... )
 
 
 
Since you most likely want to compare results of same hardware and benchmark than yours.
 
 
 
--[[User:Nomeata|Nomeata]]
 
----
 
I think so, too. Obviously the goal of fps comparison is to find out the best configuration for a specific model.
 
 
 
--[[User:Akw|akw]] 00:22, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 
----
 
 
 
done it
 
--[[User:Nomeata|Nomeata]] 00:31, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 
 
 
----
 
I had it like this in the beginning.
 
 
 
But i thought about splitting it into single pages and then this order would mean a lot of single pages. So i turned it around, because:
 
 
 
Testapplication -> Driver ---link---> TestAppDriverPage -> ThinkpadModel is a hirarchy with a low number of single pages (All models for one TestApp-Driver-combination on one page).
 
 
 
But you are right, it makes more sense from the comparison point of view to put the drivers in the end.
 
 
 
Shell we split into separate pages anyway? And if so, on the Model level or on the testapp level?
 
 
 
[[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]]
 
 
 
----
 
Not before it is not too full
 
 
 
Or just use a tabluar format, sorted this way, for example:
 
 
 
{| border="1"
 
|+ Benchmark results
 
|-
 
! Model !! Benchmark !! Driver !! fps !! User and Notes
 
|-
 
| T41p [[2373-GHG]] || fgl_glxgears || radeon || 259fps || [[User:Nomeata|Nomeata]] ''vesa framebuffer active, therefore no mtrr for radeon''
 
|-
 
| T41p [[2373-GHG]] || glxgears || radeon || 1209fps || [[User:Nomeata|Nomeata]] ''vesa framebuffer active, therefore no mtrr for radeon''
 
|}
 
 
 
--[[User:Nomeata|Nomeata]] 00:44, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 
----
 
 
 
I prefer the tabular way, it makes a lot of sense here.
 
 
 
[[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 00:55, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 
 
 
----
 
Done
 
 
 
--[[User:Nomeata|Nomeata]] 00:57, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 
----
 
Maybe it would be also interesting which version of X and fglrx was running while benchmarking. I noticed some discussion about the new fglrx ver. 12 being somewhat slower than older versions and so on.
 
 
 
--[[User:Akw|akw]] 01:10, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 
 
 
----
 
Sure, but then we need a way to shorten the notes. For example, Just put "''no mtrr''" in there and explain it below the table
 
--[[User:Nomeata|Nomeata]] 01:19, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 
----
 
Good idea!
 
 
 
--[[User:Akw|akw]] 01:27, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 
----
 
Done it. It wraps the lines here, but that's ok
 
 
 
--[[User:Nomeata|Nomeata]] 01:49, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 

Revision as of 12:25, 29 September 2004

(for discussoin of formatting, see history -- Nomeata)

Shoudn't the kernel be after the driver, since I'd rather compare different kernels and same driver than different driver and same kernel? --Nomeata 13:25, 29 Sep 2004 (CEST)