Difference between revisions of "Talk:3Dfps"
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
done it | done it | ||
--[[User:Nomeata|Nomeata]] 00:31, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST) | --[[User:Nomeata|Nomeata]] 00:31, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I had it like this in the beginning. | ||
| + | |||
| + | But i thought about splitting it into single pages and then this order would mean a lot of single pages. So i turned it around, because: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Testapplication -> Driver ---link---> TestAppDriverPage -> ThinkpadModel is a hirarchy with a low number of single pages (All models for one TestApp-Driver-combination on one page). | ||
| + | |||
| + | But you are right, it makes more sense from the comparison point of view to put the drivers in the end. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Shell we split into separate pages anyway? And if so, on the Model level or on the testapp level? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] | ||
Revision as of 23:33, 24 September 2004
I Nomeata suggest
- Thinkpad Model (i.e. Thinkpad T40)
- test application (i.e. glxgears / 3Dmark2000 / ... )
- Driver (i.e. fglrx / xfree / xorg / ibm / dna / omega / ... )
- test application (i.e. glxgears / 3Dmark2000 / ... )
Since you most likely want to compare results of same hardware and benchmark than yours.
--Nomeata
I think so, too. Obviously the goal of fps comparison is to find out the best configuration for a specific model.
--akw 00:22, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)
done it --Nomeata 00:31, 25 Sep 2004 (CEST)
I had it like this in the beginning.
But i thought about splitting it into single pages and then this order would mean a lot of single pages. So i turned it around, because:
Testapplication -> Driver ---link---> TestAppDriverPage -> ThinkpadModel is a hirarchy with a low number of single pages (All models for one TestApp-Driver-combination on one page).
But you are right, it makes more sense from the comparison point of view to put the drivers in the end.
Shell we split into separate pages anyway? And if so, on the Model level or on the testapp level?
