Difference between revisions of "Talk:Problems with SATA and Linux"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
1) what type it is | 1) what type it is | ||
2) if it is fixed on the mainboard or if it is possible to solder in a new one | 2) if it is fixed on the mainboard or if it is possible to solder in a new one | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Z series''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Since the Z series uses a SATA controller and disk, without the bridge, would it be possible to make SATA ATAPI support as a module that you could load only when using the optical drive? Then, for everyday use, the experimental options of PATA and ATAPI with ata_piix would not be needed, moving you one step further in the direction of stability. | ||
Revision as of 07:04, 5 October 2005
regarding the "BIOS error 2010 on user-installed hard disk": the text says that corruption occurs if you use a harddisk without the specific ibm bios. would be interesting if it is possible to fix this problem in the kernel so that you can use any disk and the kernel doesn't use specific ATA commands which are known to cause problems.
in the tabook i didn't find any specification of the SATA bridge. it would be interesting: 1) what type it is 2) if it is fixed on the mainboard or if it is possible to solder in a new one
Z series
Since the Z series uses a SATA controller and disk, without the bridge, would it be possible to make SATA ATAPI support as a module that you could load only when using the optical drive? Then, for everyday use, the experimental options of PATA and ATAPI with ata_piix would not be needed, moving you one step further in the direction of stability.
