Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ultrabay Slim Multi-Burner Plus Drive"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[User:84.191.159.226|84.191.159.226]] 14:14, 30 Sep 2005 (CEST) | [[User:84.191.159.226|84.191.159.226]] 14:14, 30 Sep 2005 (CEST) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | For the record, the two pictures are ~60K each. If each and every one of the [[Special:Statistics|(currently) 479]] pages that are "probably legitimate content pages" had a similar load, the total disk space for images would be around 60MB. --[[User:Thinker|Thinker]] 18:20, 30 Sep 2005 (CEST) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 17:20, 30 September 2005
Hei,
i don't like the idea of including large scale pictures for everything. While i can see the benefits of it, i think it wastes too much server space.
I want to ask for other peoples opinions here. I'd recommend including only small scale pictures comparable in size and style to the ones included in the model categories or like on the UltraBay Plus Devices pages.
What's other peoples opinions?
84.191.159.226 14:14, 30 Sep 2005 (CEST)
For the record, the two pictures are ~60K each. If each and every one of the (currently) 479 pages that are "probably legitimate content pages" had a similar load, the total disk space for images would be around 60MB. --Thinker 18:20, 30 Sep 2005 (CEST)
