Difference between revisions of "Processors"
(→General information) |
m (→Intel Processors found in ThinkPads: rename Pentium MMX) |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The first ThinkPads contained a variety of processors from different manufacturers like Intel, Via, and IBM themselves. But with the start of the Pentium era, IBM focussed on Intel and hence almost all ThinkPads since then feature Intel processors. The only exceptions are the three PowerPC based models of the 8xx series. | The first ThinkPads contained a variety of processors from different manufacturers like Intel, Via, and IBM themselves. But with the start of the Pentium era, IBM focussed on Intel and hence almost all ThinkPads since then feature Intel processors. The only exceptions are the three PowerPC based models of the 8xx series. | ||
| − | In June 2000 IBM presented[http://news.com.com/2100-1040-242488.html?legacy=cnet] a | + | In June 2000 IBM presented[http://news.com.com/2100-1040-242488.html?legacy=cnet] a prototype of the ThinkPad 240 featuring a Transmeta Crusoe 5600 processor. These notebooks were planned[http://www.my-esm.com/digest/story/OEG20000622S0023] to hit the market in the forth quarter of that year, but in October IBM dropped their plans[http://news.com.com/2100-1001-247905.html?legacy=cnet][http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/11/01/ibm_knifes_crusoe_thinkpad/] and opted for Intel instead. |
| − | ==Processors found in ThinkPads== | + | {| border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" style="width:100%;vertical-align:top;" |
| − | + | | style="vertical-align:top;width:50%;padding-right:20px;" | | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ==Intel Processors found in ThinkPads== | |
| − | + | *[[Intel 386]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel 486]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Pentium]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Mobile Pentium MMX]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Mobile Pentium II]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Mobile Celeron (1)]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Mobile Pentium III]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Mobile Celeron (2)]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Mobile Pentium III-M]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Mobile Celeron (3)]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Pentium 4]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Celeron (4)]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Celeron D]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Mobile Pentium 4]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Mobile Pentium 4-M]] | |
| − | + | *[[Intel Mobile Celeron (4)]] | |
| − | **[[Intel Celeron | + | *[[Intel Pentium M (Banias)]] |
| − | * | + | *[[Intel Pentium M (Dothan)]] |
| − | **[[Cyrix Cx486]] | + | *[[Intel Celeron M]] |
| − | + | *[[Intel Core Solo (Yonah)]] | |
| − | **[[IBM PowerPC | + | *[[Intel Core Duo (Yonah)]] |
| + | *[[Intel Celeron Dual-Core]] | ||
| + | *[[Intel Pentium Dual Core]] | ||
| + | *[[Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom)]] | ||
| + | *[[Intel Core 2 Duo (Penryn)]] | ||
| + | *[[Intel Core 2 Quad]] | ||
| + | *[[Intel Core i3]] | ||
| + | *[[Intel Core i5]] | ||
| + | *[[Intel Core i7]] | ||
| + | | style="vertical-align:top;width:50%;" | | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Other Processors found in ThinkPads== | ||
| + | *[[Cyrix Cx486]] | ||
| + | *[[IBM 486]] | ||
| + | *[[IBM 5x86c]] | ||
| + | *[[IBM PowerPC 603]] | ||
| + | *[[AMD Athlon Neo]] | ||
| + | *[[AMD Athlon Neo X2]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==External Sources== | ||
| + | *[ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/pc/pcinstitute/psref/tecbook.pdf IBM Reference Sheet: Current Processors] | ||
| + | *[ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/pc/pcinstitute/psref/tecwbook.pdf IBM Reference Sheet: Withdrawn Processors] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:53, 20 February 2012
Contents
General information
The first ThinkPads contained a variety of processors from different manufacturers like Intel, Via, and IBM themselves. But with the start of the Pentium era, IBM focussed on Intel and hence almost all ThinkPads since then feature Intel processors. The only exceptions are the three PowerPC based models of the 8xx series.
In June 2000 IBM presented[1] a prototype of the ThinkPad 240 featuring a Transmeta Crusoe 5600 processor. These notebooks were planned[2] to hit the market in the forth quarter of that year, but in October IBM dropped their plans[3][4] and opted for Intel instead.
