Difference between revisions of "User talk:Pebolle"
m |
(→HPAFS) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 22:30, 24 January 2006 (CET) | [[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 22:30, 24 January 2006 (CET) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==HPAFS== | ||
| + | Hei, you might wanna create a separate "hpafs" page for your driver and categorize it as a driver page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 01:41, 3 March 2006 (CET) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Well I said "alpha quality" (or something similar). Maybe that's even too optimistic: proof of concept might be better. I know the mantra is "release early, release often" but this might be too early ... | ||
| + | |||
| + | By the way, would hpafs really qualify as a "driver"? I'd say it's more a "tool" or a "utility". | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Pebolle|Paul Bolle]] 14:45, 3 March 2006 (CET) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | :-) I'd say it's kind of in between. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 16:54, 3 March 2006 (CET) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Latest revision as of 16:54, 3 March 2006
Removing the discussion on the PreDesktop Area Talk page is fine. ;-) I added some of the information from the IBM link discussion into the article, though, since i think it sheds more light into the difference between PSAs and RPs.
Wyrfel 12:39, 5 Nov 2005 (CET)
Nice to hear. Edits are fine with me (until I change my mind and invoke the power to reedit that a Wiki gives its users ...)
Paul Bolle 22:40, 5 Nov 2005 (CET)
Hei, just wanted to tell you that i appreciate what you did to the PreDesktop Area pages (reorg). Wyrfel 03:18, 21 January 2006 (CET)
Nice to hear. Thanks.
Paul Bolle 00:35, 24 January 2006 (CET)
Just saw your edit in Talk:Predesktop Area. ;-) If you have such a long result output, just surround it by >pre></pre> tags. Especially on talk pages it doesn't matter that much.
I believe that when ThinkWiki uses MediaWiki 1.6, i can modify the templates to make things (like multiline) more simple.
Wyrfel 22:30, 24 January 2006 (CET)
HPAFS
Hei, you might wanna create a separate "hpafs" page for your driver and categorize it as a driver page.
Wyrfel 01:41, 3 March 2006 (CET)
Well I said "alpha quality" (or something similar). Maybe that's even too optimistic: proof of concept might be better. I know the mantra is "release early, release often" but this might be too early ...
By the way, would hpafs really qualify as a "driver"? I'd say it's more a "tool" or a "utility".
Paul Bolle 14:45, 3 March 2006 (CET)
- -) I'd say it's kind of in between.
Wyrfel 16:54, 3 March 2006 (CET)
