Difference between revisions of "Talk:Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900"
(Moving applications between screens) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It was a pain to get it working under xorg, and once it was running, acceleration required it to be set to 16bit, at 1024x768x16 (a X41) the default glxgears shows ~1300fps, external monitor did not get acceleration (~600fps). And the ogl rendering seams to be buggy with missing textures here and there. I don't know how this translates to UT2004 performance , but you can probably run some opengl screensavers with no problem. | It was a pain to get it working under xorg, and once it was running, acceleration required it to be set to 16bit, at 1024x768x16 (a X41) the default glxgears shows ~1300fps, external monitor did not get acceleration (~600fps). And the ogl rendering seams to be buggy with missing textures here and there. I don't know how this translates to UT2004 performance , but you can probably run some opengl screensavers with no problem. | ||
Hopefully xorg 6.9 and 7.0 will provide proper support. --[[User:Meta|Meta]] 23:01, 29 Nov 2005 (CET) | Hopefully xorg 6.9 and 7.0 will provide proper support. --[[User:Meta|Meta]] 23:01, 29 Nov 2005 (CET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Moving applications between screens == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Do you mean xinerama? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Section "ServerFlags" | ||
+ | Option "Xinerama" "true" | ||
+ | EndSection |
Revision as of 13:31, 23 January 2007
What is the openGL performance like on this card? Could I play UT2004 and run the OpenGL screensaver hacks at a reasonable speed. In comparison To say a Radeon 9000/9200 card?
It was a pain to get it working under xorg, and once it was running, acceleration required it to be set to 16bit, at 1024x768x16 (a X41) the default glxgears shows ~1300fps, external monitor did not get acceleration (~600fps). And the ogl rendering seams to be buggy with missing textures here and there. I don't know how this translates to UT2004 performance , but you can probably run some opengl screensavers with no problem. Hopefully xorg 6.9 and 7.0 will provide proper support. --Meta 23:01, 29 Nov 2005 (CET)
Moving applications between screens
Do you mean xinerama?
Section "ServerFlags" Option "Xinerama" "true" EndSection