Difference between revisions of "Talk:Displays"
| (9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 20:22, 8 February 2006 (CET) | [[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 20:22, 8 February 2006 (CET) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | Hmm... I just saw an article at the mobilityguru about DIY LCD replacement. The company that makes them seems to be operating with highly sensible prices compared to Lenovo's rates (I'll withhold the name for the time being, as I do not want to spam thinkwiki). | ||
| − | + | Do you think that including an article on thinkwiki on this subject (i.e. DIY LCD replacement) is a worthy cause? | |
| − | [[User: | + | [[User:igorr|igorr]] Fri Feb 24 17:47:36 CET 2006 |
| − | + | ||
| + | == manufacturer column == | ||
| − | + | I think we should add a column to the table with the actual manufacturer name and model. | |
| − | + | --[[User:Tonko|Tonko]] 17:50, 15 February 2006 (CET) | |
| − | + | It's a nice idea, and I thought about it. This will greatly increase the number of table entries, as often there are different types of panels used with the same basic specs. Also, it will not be easy to find certain manufacturers, and model numbers - even harder. Nonetheless, if you do add manufacturer / model columns, I'll try to fill them in as much as I can. | |
| − | [[User: | + | --[[User:Drst|Drst]] 18:53, 15 February 2006 (CET+1) |
---- | ---- | ||
| + | I splitted the page into sub pages and redesigned the tables to include the two columns as suggested. | ||
| − | + | Separate rows is not a problem. Empty table cells is more, but i think it's preferable to have a way to provide detailed and precise information where we have it. | |
| − | [[User: | + | [[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 18:44, 15 February 2006 (CET) |
---- | ---- | ||
Latest revision as of 18:08, 24 February 2006
Just to not loose the thought: we should at some point (maybe when the at the moment still quite fractured information has settled a bit) split this page into several sub pages (like the processors page). The sub pages and their hierachical link structure could/should be:
- Displays
- STN display
- DSTN display
- FRSTN display
- HPA display
- TFT display
- FlexView display -> should be listed on ThinkPad Technologies as well
- MaxBright display -> should be listed on ThinkPad Technologies as well
Also, if anyone would have pointers to reliable information about display type, brightness and contrast ratios, please share them here so we can complete the info.
Wyrfel 20:22, 8 February 2006 (CET)
Hmm... I just saw an article at the mobilityguru about DIY LCD replacement. The company that makes them seems to be operating with highly sensible prices compared to Lenovo's rates (I'll withhold the name for the time being, as I do not want to spam thinkwiki).
Do you think that including an article on thinkwiki on this subject (i.e. DIY LCD replacement) is a worthy cause?
igorr Fri Feb 24 17:47:36 CET 2006
manufacturer column
I think we should add a column to the table with the actual manufacturer name and model.
--Tonko 17:50, 15 February 2006 (CET)
It's a nice idea, and I thought about it. This will greatly increase the number of table entries, as often there are different types of panels used with the same basic specs. Also, it will not be easy to find certain manufacturers, and model numbers - even harder. Nonetheless, if you do add manufacturer / model columns, I'll try to fill them in as much as I can.
--Drst 18:53, 15 February 2006 (CET+1)
I splitted the page into sub pages and redesigned the tables to include the two columns as suggested.
Separate rows is not a problem. Empty table cells is more, but i think it's preferable to have a way to provide detailed and precise information where we have it.
Wyrfel 18:44, 15 February 2006 (CET)
