Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tpctl"
(Moved) |
(→"thinkpad" module kernel compatibility) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
--[[User:Thinker|Thinker]] 23:11, 19 Dec 2005 (CET) | --[[User:Thinker|Thinker]] 23:11, 19 Dec 2005 (CET) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is the patch I'd been using up to 2.6.15: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <code> | ||
+ | [root@ccb-thinkpad thinkpad-5.8]# more thinkpad-2.6-per_cpu.patch | ||
+ | --- 2.6/drivers/thinkpadpm.c.ccb 2005-07-02 01:02:47.000000000 -0400 | ||
+ | +++ 2.6/drivers/thinkpadpm.c 2005-07-02 01:13:20.000000000 -0400 | ||
+ | @@ -171,8 +171,8 @@ | ||
+ | #define get_gdt_table() (cpu_gdt_table[get_cpu()]) | ||
+ | #define put_gdt_table() put_cpu() | ||
+ | #else | ||
+ | -#define get_gdt_table() (get_cpu_ptr(cpu_gdt_table)) | ||
+ | -#define put_gdt_table() put_cpu_ptr(cpu_gdt_table) | ||
+ | +#define get_gdt_table() per_cpu(cpu_gdt_table, smp_processor_id()) | ||
+ | +#define put_gdt_table() put_cpu() | ||
+ | #endif | ||
+ | </code> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Sounds like TedTso took a slightly different approach. | ||
+ | |||
+ | As it stands, it won't compile since the release of 2.6.15 because the | ||
+ | once global pm_active variable in the kernel is no longer visible. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ccb |
Revision as of 22:03, 12 February 2006
"thinkpad" module kernel compatibility
Ajunge, how do you compile the "thinkpad" module compile on kernel >=2.6.9? The latest thinkpad version (5.8) still uses "get_cpu_ptr" and "set_cpu_ptr", which were removed in 2.6.9.
--Thinker 13:53, 10 Dec 2005 (CET)
The Debian thinkpad-source package in unstable (version 5.8-4) works just fine; I'm compiling it with 2.6.14 without any problems. And get_cpu_ptr is present; it's defined in include/linux/percpu.h.
--TedTso 18:56, 17 Dec 2005 (EDT)
Stock thinkpad_5.8.tar.gz doesn't #include percpu.h anyway, and doesn't compile on vanilla 2.6.14.3 or 2.6.15-rc5. Maybe Debian patched it? In that case the article page should ref the patch.
--Thinker 11:50, 18 Dec 2005 (CET)
Oops, my mistake. I forgot that I had patched my copy of thinkpadpm.c. I replaced the use of get_cpu_ptr and set_cpu_ptr with get_cpu_val() and set_cpu_val(). I just double checked, and it tpctl is working for me on 2.6.15-rc5.
--TedTso 14:45, 19 Dec 2005 (EDT)
Care to send a patch? It would be useful on the article page, and maybe we can get it into upstream.
--Thinker 23:11, 19 Dec 2005 (CET)
This is the patch I'd been using up to 2.6.15:
[root@ccb-thinkpad thinkpad-5.8]# more thinkpad-2.6-per_cpu.patch
--- 2.6/drivers/thinkpadpm.c.ccb 2005-07-02 01:02:47.000000000 -0400
+++ 2.6/drivers/thinkpadpm.c 2005-07-02 01:13:20.000000000 -0400
@@ -171,8 +171,8 @@
#define get_gdt_table() (cpu_gdt_table[get_cpu()])
#define put_gdt_table() put_cpu()
#else
-#define get_gdt_table() (get_cpu_ptr(cpu_gdt_table))
-#define put_gdt_table() put_cpu_ptr(cpu_gdt_table)
+#define get_gdt_table() per_cpu(cpu_gdt_table, smp_processor_id())
+#define put_gdt_table() put_cpu()
#endif
Sounds like TedTso took a slightly different approach.
As it stands, it won't compile since the release of 2.6.15 because the once global pm_active variable in the kernel is no longer visible.
ccb