Difference between revisions of "User talk:Rasto"

From ThinkWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
[[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 04:36, 26 January 2006 (CET)
 
[[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 04:36, 26 January 2006 (CET)
 
----
 
----
 +
Thanks :-). There's one more thing that bothers me, but I'm not quite certain about this, so I didn't add it straight away.
 +
I did fglrx installs by running ati-installer. The X11 version doesn't however report any errors most of the time, also when there are.
 +
Also. When it fnishes successfully, it leaves the *.ko files in /lib/modules/fglrx, and doesn't copy them to /lib/modules/linux-whatever/fglrx.
 +
At least very often. I'm using a official kernel, not a debian one. Perhaps this causes some of the confusion about fglrx? Also- it can be, that
 +
you install a new version and the old modules are still being loaded, and therefore accel works and you don't notice anything?
 +
 +
[[User:Rasto|Rasto]] 14:11, 26 January 2006 (CET)

Revision as of 14:11, 26 January 2006

Hei,

sorry, my mistake with the fglrx drivers. Didn't think of that there's a source kernel module part., but of course you're right.

About the date... if you place ~~~~ (four tildes) in your edit, it will be replaced by your linkified username plus timestamp.

Wyrfel 04:36, 26 January 2006 (CET)


Thanks :-). There's one more thing that bothers me, but I'm not quite certain about this, so I didn't add it straight away. I did fglrx installs by running ati-installer. The X11 version doesn't however report any errors most of the time, also when there are. Also. When it fnishes successfully, it leaves the *.ko files in /lib/modules/fglrx, and doesn't copy them to /lib/modules/linux-whatever/fglrx. At least very often. I'm using a official kernel, not a debian one. Perhaps this causes some of the confusion about fglrx? Also- it can be, that you install a new version and the old modules are still being loaded, and therefore accel works and you don't notice anything?

Rasto 14:11, 26 January 2006 (CET)