Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pentium M undervolting and underclocking"

From ThinkWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(which patch to use?)
Line 29: Line 29:
  
 
--[[User:Thinker|Thinker]] 13:06, 21 Dec 2005 (CET)
 
--[[User:Thinker|Thinker]] 13:06, 21 Dec 2005 (CET)
 +
----
 +
 +
== Init Script ==
 +
Hi. I'm the author of the SysFS patch of "Alternative 2"
 +
 +
I have recently seen that someone has added your init script to my wiki page on gentoo-wiki. But unfortunatly this guy has removed all the exisiting content of the page at the same time. So a few hours later an admin of the site as reverted the page to its previous state.
 +
 +
Well that was just for the story of how I came to your wiki page. I just wanted to say That I have adedd again the init script to my page.
 +
It's a nice thing. A lot more "gentoo spirit" that what I was using before (that is adding some code in /etc/conf.d/local.start)
 +
 +
I have made some modifications to the init script before adding it on my wiki page. So maybe you want to have a look at it.
 +
 +
Cheers!
 +
--[[User:Bdz|Bdz]] 23:26, 10 Jan 2006 (CET)
 +
 
----
 
----

Revision as of 23:26, 10 January 2006

Hei Thinker,

according to my notion of the character of this page, i thought it should possibly be renamed to something like "How to lower voltage and clock speed on Pentium M processors" ("lower" might be replaced by "finetune" or "manually lower" or "tweak" or something else expressing more the expert audience of the article). This has the following advantages:

  • complies with the naming scheme ;-)
  • has words more likely to be found in google (voltage vs. undervolting; clock, speed vs. underclocking)
  • Are undervolting/underclocking proper english words anyway?
  • Follows a scheme of "from general to specific". The topic of the article is underclocking/undervolting. That it's for Pentium M processors is kind of secondary to that.

What do you think? I can do it if you agree.

Wyrfel 00:21, 21 Oct 2005 (CEST)


Good points. Personally I'm fond of short technical titles, but I agree about accessibility and consistency with the rest of the site. I have a feeling (though no proof) that the underclocking doesn't really work (as I noted recently), so how about "Reducing voltage on the Pentium M processor" for now?

BTW, "underclocking" is pretty standard techie jargon (and a clear parallel of the well-known "overclocking"). "Undervolting" is somewhat less common, though I've seen it in use.

--Thinker 00:55, 21 Oct 2005 (CEST)


Which patch to use?

Since I might find the time to fiddle around with reducing the power consumption further, I wonder which of the 3 alternatives works best. Any recommendations?

--spiney 11:05, 21 Dec 2005 (CET)


They all work... I think Alternative 2 is easiest to use.

--Thinker 13:06, 21 Dec 2005 (CET)


Init Script

Hi. I'm the author of the SysFS patch of "Alternative 2"

I have recently seen that someone has added your init script to my wiki page on gentoo-wiki. But unfortunatly this guy has removed all the exisiting content of the page at the same time. So a few hours later an admin of the site as reverted the page to its previous state.

Well that was just for the story of how I came to your wiki page. I just wanted to say That I have adedd again the init script to my page. It's a nice thing. A lot more "gentoo spirit" that what I was using before (that is adding some code in /etc/conf.d/local.start)

I have made some modifications to the init script before adding it on my wiki page. So maybe you want to have a look at it.

Cheers! --Bdz 23:26, 10 Jan 2006 (CET)