Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pentium M undervolting and underclocking"
(Title?) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 00:21, 21 Oct 2005 (CEST) | [[User:Wyrfel|Wyrfel]] 00:21, 21 Oct 2005 (CEST) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Good points. Personally I'm fond of short technical titles, but I agree about accessibility and consistency with the rest of the site. I have a feeling (though no proof) that the under<i>clocking</i> doesn't really work (as I noted recently), so how about "Reducing voltage on the Pentium M processor" for now? | ||
| + | |||
| + | BTW, "underclocking" is pretty standard techie jargon (and a clear parallel of the well-known "overclocking"). "Undervolting" is somewhat less common, though I've seen it in use. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Thinker|Thinker]] 00:55, 21 Oct 2005 (CEST) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 23:55, 20 October 2005
Hei Thinker,
according to my notion of the character of this page, i thought it should possibly be renamed to something like "How to lower voltage and clock speed on Pentium M processors" ("lower" might be replaced by "finetune" or "manually lower" or "tweak" or something else expressing more the expert audience of the article). This has the following advantages:
- complies with the naming scheme ;-)
- has words more likely to be found in google (voltage vs. undervolting; clock, speed vs. underclocking)
- Are undervolting/underclocking proper english words anyway?
- Follows a scheme of "from general to specific". The topic of the article is underclocking/undervolting. That it's for Pentium M processors is kind of secondary to that.
What do you think? I can do it if you agree.
Wyrfel 00:21, 21 Oct 2005 (CEST)
Good points. Personally I'm fond of short technical titles, but I agree about accessibility and consistency with the rest of the site. I have a feeling (though no proof) that the underclocking doesn't really work (as I noted recently), so how about "Reducing voltage on the Pentium M processor" for now?
BTW, "underclocking" is pretty standard techie jargon (and a clear parallel of the well-known "overclocking"). "Undervolting" is somewhat less common, though I've seen it in use.
--Thinker 00:55, 21 Oct 2005 (CEST)
